MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052547179 · doi:10.1017/s1743921309030877

Cartography of the magnetic fields and chemical spots of Ap stars

2008· article· en· W2052547179 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. Silvester, O. Kochukhov, G. A. Wade, N. Piskunov, J. D. Landstreet, S. Bagnulo

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Astronomical Union · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityRoyal Military College of CanadaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarsPhysicsObservatoryAstrophysicsMagnetic fieldPhotosphereSpectral lineTelescopeAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We will introduce a project using Magnetic Doppler Imaging (MDI) to create assumption-free vector magnetic field maps and chemical surface structure maps of chemically peculiar A and B type (or Ap) stars. We are exploiting the latest generation of spectropolarimeters (NARVAL at the Pic du Midi observatory, and ESPaDOnS at the Canada-France-Hawaii telescope), to obtain high-resolution time series of Stokes IQUV spectra of a selection of Ap stars. The spectra have superior signal-to-noise ratio, resolution and wavelength coverage to those used previously. This combined with the ground-breaking inversion techniques introduced by Kochukhov et al. (2002) results in maps which represent the state-of-the-art in the field of stellar cartography. These maps will allow us to better understand the links between the magnetic field and the physical processes leading to the formation of chemical structures in the photosphere and allow us to address questions surrounding the detailed magnetic field geometry of Ap stars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Astronomical UnionSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207