MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052549769 · doi:10.4000/conflits.2113

Les combattants de la « mort certaine ». Les sens du sacrifice à l’horizon de la Grande Guerre

2006· article· fr· W2052549769 on OpenAlex
François Lagrange

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCultures & conflits/Cultures et conflits · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSacrificePhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Témoignages et analyses historiques assimilent souvent les épreuves des combattants de la Grande Guerre à des sacrifices. Rien ne les relie, à première vue, aux formes répertoriées de la mort volontaire (kamikazes ou attentats-suicides). Pourtant il existe des éléments qui permettent d’envisager, à la marge, par exemple dans le cadre français de l’expérience du premier conflit mondial, une certaine proximité entre discours du sacrifice de soi et mort volontaire. Une analyse des conceptions d’auteurs militaires notables avant 1914 restitue leur vision radicale du sacrifice de soi à la guerre, qui aboutit à valoriser la « mort certaine ». Une enquête complémentaire fait apparaître, au début de la Grande Guerre, quelques cas de « mort certaine », cas-limites peu nombreux mais significatifs qu’il importe de ne pas négliger dans une réflexion comparatiste sur le sens et les usages du sacrifice de soi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it