MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052552970 · doi:10.3354/meps09150

Modelling habitat associations of the common spider conch in the Cocos (Keeling) Islands

2011· article· en· W2052552970 on OpenAlexafffund
L. M. Bellchambers, Jessica J. Meeuwig, S. N. Evans, Pierre Legendre

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Ecology Progress Series · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAustralian Government
KeywordsSeagrassHabitatEcologyGeographyBenthic zoneFisheryAbundance (ecology)Marine protected areaOceanographyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The type and configuration of benthic habitats can influence community structure of marine fauna and the effectiveness of management actions, such as spatial closures.We quantified the relationship between the distribution and density of Lambis lambis, an exploited marine gastropod, and available benthic habitats at the Cocos (Keeling) Islands.We used 3 modelling approaches to develop a model of the density of L. lambis as a function of habitat: conventional polynomial regression, Moran's eigenvector maps (MEM) and variance partitioning.Distribution and abundance of L. lambis was not uniform throughout the lagoon.Both the amount and configuration of habitat influenced L. lambis density; the highest densities were associated with moderate levels of hard macroalgae and submassive corals, and the lowest densities with seagrass and relict coral.These results illustrate that incorporating information on the distribution and patchiness of preferred habitats is essential to ensure that appropriate habitats are included in the design and implementation of long-term monitoring programs and management tools such as spatial closures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Ecology Progress SeriesSame topicCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesFrench-language works237,207