Study on the Experiment of Concentrating Coking Wastewaters by Air-blowing Vacuum Membrane Distillation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the article, a new air-blowing vacuum membrane distillation (AVMD) process is proposed, and it forms the air-liquidflows in the membrane by forcedly blowing airs to the hot feed liquids circularly flowing in the hollow fiber membrane,and forms the AVMD system to enhance the turbulent degree of the liquids. The intense disturbance of air bubbles andthe strong cutting power at the surface of membrane can reduce the depth of the boundary layer of liquids, thetemperature and the concentration polarization of the membrane surface, and enhance the speed of heat and masstransfer to enhance the membrane distillation flux and control the membrane pollution. By the process that theoptimized AVMD process is used in the coking wastewater treatment process of certain enterprise, the influence of thepretreatment technique of the wastewater on the removal effect of COD is studied in the article, and the influences ofthe vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) and the AVMD process on the wastewater concentrating treatment effect andefficiency are also respectively researched in the article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".