Study on the Experiment of Concentrating Coking Wastewaters by Air-blowing Vacuum Membrane Distillation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the article, a new air-blowing vacuum membrane distillation (AVMD) process is proposed, and it forms the air-liquidflows in the membrane by forcedly blowing airs to the hot feed liquids circularly flowing in the hollow fiber membrane,and forms the AVMD system to enhance the turbulent degree of the liquids. The intense disturbance of air bubbles andthe strong cutting power at the surface of membrane can reduce the depth of the boundary layer of liquids, thetemperature and the concentration polarization of the membrane surface, and enhance the speed of heat and masstransfer to enhance the membrane distillation flux and control the membrane pollution. By the process that theoptimized AVMD process is used in the coking wastewater treatment process of certain enterprise, the influence of thepretreatment technique of the wastewater on the removal effect of COD is studied in the article, and the influences ofthe vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) and the AVMD process on the wastewater concentrating treatment effect andefficiency are also respectively researched in the article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it