MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052628495 · doi:10.1504/ijsoi.2012.052180

Optimisation of manufacturing cell formation with extended great deluge meta-heuristic approach

2012· article· en· W2052628495 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Services Operations and Informatics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCellular manufacturingGroup technologyScheduling (production processes)Computer scienceJob shop schedulingCell formationMetaheuristicMeta heuristicGenetic algorithm schedulingMathematical optimizationIndustrial engineeringDistributed computingOperations researchEngineeringFlow shop schedulingManufacturing engineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concepts of cellular manufacturing system (CMS) and cell scheduling (CS) have been widely used to meet various production needs. The CMS is a particular case of group technology (GT) applied to improve the production efficiency and reduce operational costs. This work addresses the machine/part grouping and group scheduling problems. The cell formation problem has long been recognised as the most challenging problem in realising the concept of cellular manufacturing. It belongs to the class of NP-hard problems. One of the most important problems in the area of production management is the scheduling problem which has also been proven to be NPhard. To solve this scheduling problem an Extended Great Deluge (EGD) metaheuristic approach is employed. The results of the proposed approach show a major improvement when compared with the results of one of the best algorithms developed so far by other researchers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it