Cyclic behaviour of loose anisotropically consolidated Ottawa sand under undrained torsional loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The behaviour of loose, anisotropically consolidated Ottawa sand was examined under undrained cyclic loading in the hollow cylinder apparatus. The stress level, the cyclic stress level and the consolidation stress ratio were varied. The instability line of anisotropically consolidated loose Ottawa sand, defined under monotonic loading, is shown to form a boundary in the vicinity of which a sudden increase in the rate of excess pore water pressure and strain accumulation is observed, and the sand strain-softens. However, this unstable response is arrested at phase transformation, and the sand specimens show a stable or temporarily stable effective stress cycle at low and high consolidation stress ratios respectively. Similar behaviour is observed for isotropically consolidated sand, which exhibits initial liquefaction after strain-softening. The terminal excess pore water pressure associated with this final stage is described as a function of consolidation stress ratio, while the development of excess pore water pressure during cyclic loading is uniquely defined for all tests as a function of normalised shear work. The cyclic resistance of the sand decreases with decreasing consolidation stress ratio. Anisotropic consolidation significantly affects the stiffness and damping ratio values of loose Ottawa sand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".