MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052676150 · doi:10.1021/ct800088e

Computational Study of Tungsten(II)-Catalyzed Rearrangements of Norbornadiene

2008· article· en· W2052676150 on OpenAlexaff
Allan L. L. East, Greg M. Berner, Adam D. Morcom, Lynn M. Mihichuk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorbornadieneTungstenCatalysisCope rearrangementChemistryNorborneneComputational chemistryDensity functional theoryMetathesisTransition stateCrystallographyCombinatorial chemistryStereochemistryPolymerizationOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rearrangements of norbornadiene (NBD, C7H8) to various alkylidenes, via a hypothetical 7-coordinate tungsten(II) complex W(CO)3I2(NBD), were studied using density-functional theory computations. An extensive search for intermediates and transition states of rearrangement was made. The theoretical method (basis sets and level of DFT) used was justified by new benchmark studies which compare optimized structural parameters to those from crystal structures of several different tungsten complexes. Transition-metal-catalyzed rearrangements of NBD are not as well-known as those of norbornene and are considerably more complicated than had been thought. This work predicts a large variety of intermediates which may be feasible targets for experimental synthesis. All the rearrangement paths to alkylidenes found here feature high activation energies of over 45 kcal mol(-1), implying that self-initiation for the ring-opening metathesis polymerization of NBD via tungsten(II) complexes must occur via an alternative mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Theory and ComputationSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207