Electronic and Molecular Structures of <i>trans</i>-Dioxotechnetium(V) Polypyridyl Complexes in the Solid State
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structures of novel Tc(V) complexes trans-[TcO(2)(py)(4)]Cl·2H(2)O (1a), trans-[TcO(2)(pic)(4)]Cl·2H(2)O (2a), and trans-[TcO(2)(pic)(4)]BPh(4) (2b) were determined by X-ray crystallography, and their spectroscopic characteristics were investigated by emission spectroscopy and atomic scale calculations. The cations adopt a tetragonally distorted octahedral geometry, with a trans orientation of the apical oxo groups. trans-[TcO(2)(pic)(4)]BPh(4) has an inversion center located on technetium; however, for trans-[TcO(2)(py)(4)]Cl·2H(2)O and trans-[TcO(2)(pic)(4)]Cl·2H(2)O, a strong H bond formed by only one of the oxo substituents introduces an asymmetry in the structure, resulting in inequivalent trans Tc-N and Tc═O distances. Upon 415 nm excitation at room temperature, the complexes exhibited broad, structureless luminescences with emission maxima at approximately 710 nm (1a) and 750 nm (2a, 2b). Like the Re(V) analogs, the Tc(V) complexes luminesce from a (3)E(g) excited state. Upon cooling the samples from 278 to 8 K, distinct vibronic features appear in the spectra of the complexes along with increases in emission intensities. The low temperature emission spectra display the characteristic progressions of the symmetric O═Tc═O and the Tc-L stretching modes. Lowest-energy, triplet excited-state distortions calculated using a time-dependent theoretical approach are in good agreement with the experimental spectra. The discovery of luminescence from the trans-dioxotechnetium(V) complexes provides the first opportunity to directly compare fundamental luminescence properties of second- and third-row d(2) metal-oxo congeners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".