Synthesis and Characterization of 3-Cyano- and 3-Nitroformazans, Nitrogen-Rich Analogues of β-Diketimine Ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis and characterization of several formazans containing strong electron-withdrawing substituents (cyano and nitro) in the 3 position of the ligand backbone are described. Reactions of aryldiazonium cations with the conjugated bases of either cyanoacetic acid or nitromethane lead to 1,5-diaryl-3-cyano- or 3-nitroformazans, respectively. When these reactions are carried out in aqueous conditions, the range of aromatic groups is limited by the stability of the diazonium salt. However, 3-nitroformazans containing bulky substituents on the nitrogen atoms (2,6-dimethylphenyl, 2,4,6-trimetyhlphenyl, 2,6-diisopropylphenyl, and 3,5-ditert-butylphenyl) could be made by performing the reactions under nonaqueous and anhydrous conditions. NMR and electronic spectroscopic studies indicate that the 3-nitroformazans exist exclusively as closed ( trans-syn, s-cis) isomers whereas the 3-cyanoformazans exist as mixtures of isomers which are substrate-dependent. The crystal structures of five of the formazans are presented: two 3-nitroformazans, both of which are closed, and three 3-cyanoformazans, two of which are closed and one of which adopts an open ( trans-syn, s-trans) structure. Solid state (diffuse reflectance) spectroscopy has been employed to ascertain the isomeric preferences of the other formazans which could not be crystallographically characterized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".