K-Means Based Prediction of Transcoded JPEG File Size and Structural Similarity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of efficiently adapting JPEG images to satisfy given constraints such as maximum file size and resolution arises in a number of applications, from universal media access for mobile browsing to multimedia messaging services. However, optimizing for perceived quality (user experience) commands a non-negligible computational cost which in the authors work, they aim to minimize by the use of low-cost predictors. In previous work, the authors presented predictors and predictor-based systems to achieve low-cost and near-optimal adaption of JPEG images under given constraints of file size and resolution. In this work, they extend and improve these solutions by including more information about images to obtain more accurate predictions of file size and quality resulting from transcoding. The authors show that the proposed method, based on the clustering of transcoding operations represented as high-dimensional vectors, significantly outperforms previous methods in accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it