An exact formulation for the synthesis of broadside Chebyshev arrays of 2N elements with interelement spacingd < λ/2
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The original formulation for the synthesis of Chebyshev arrays is applicable to the case of an even or odd number of elements for interelement spacing d ≥ λ/2, where λ is the wavelength. The restriction on d is to ensure that the transformation needed for the polynomial/array factor correspondence provides a radiation pattern that is indeed optimal in the sense of supplying the minimum first-null beamwidth for the given number of elements and specified sidelobe level. This same transformation does not guarantee optimality if d < λ/2. Subsequent formulations show how the transformation must be altered to reclaim optimality if d < λ/2, but only for an odd number of elements. In this paper, we show how the formulation may be broadened to provide a means of synthesizing such optimal arrays for an even number of elements when d < λ/2. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 48: 457–463, 2006; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.21378
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it