A Theoretical Study of the Formation of the Aminoacetonitrile Precursor of Glycine on Icy Grain Mantles in the Interstellar Medium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electronic structure calculations have been carried out for one of the key reactions in a Strecker synthesis route to the amino acid glycine, in connection with amino acid production in the interstellar medium (ISM). Density functional calculations at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level have been performed for the reaction between methanimine, CH 2 NH, and the two isomers HNC/HCN, leading to aminoacetonitrile a known precursor of glycine in both the gas phase and on a model icy grain surface. Three mechanisms are evidenced in the reference gas-phase calculations; for CH 2 NH reacting with HCN, there are two routes referred to as indirect and direct, and for CH 2 NH reacting with the isomer HNC, a one-step mechanism is found. All of these reaction paths have quite high barriers, but on a model interstellar grain icy surface, very considerable barrier reduction results due to a concerted proton relay mechanism. Explicit water molecules in a reaction ring are shown to participate in this relay mechanism in the reactions of CH 2 NH both with HCN and with the HNC isomer. The inclusion of two explicit H 2 O molecules leads to the strongest effect for the concerted proton transfer. With several further solvating waters included, this proton relay route to aminoacetonitrile for the HNC isomer via a direct mechanism is found to have a very low free-energy barrier at 50 K, Δ G 50K < 1 kcal/mol, and thus appears to be feasible in the ISM. The corresponding reaction with HCN, however, has a much higher barrier, Δ G 50K = 7 kcal/mol. The significance of these results for glycine production in the ISM is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".