MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052722033 · doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(09)33436-9

Women’s expectations of treatment and care after an antenatal HIV diagnosis in Lilongwe, Malawi

2009· article· en· W2052722033 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Levy

Bibliographic record

VenueReproductive Health Matters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReferralFocus groupMedicineContext (archaeology)Health careFamily medicineQualitative researchNursingDeveloping countryPopulationPublic healthEnvironmental healthEconomic growthSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Women in sub-Saharan Africa are increasingly learning their HIV status in prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) programmes in the context of antenatal care. This paper examines women's decisions about HIV testing and their experience of PMTCT and HIV-related care in one clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi. It is based on qualitative, ethnographic research conducted in 2004 and 2005, including interviews and focus group discussions with 55 HIV-positive women participating in a PMTCT programme, and 21 interviews with key informants from the programme and the health system. Women's expectations from testing were consistent with the benefits for their own health and their infants' health, as communicated by nurses. However, the PMTCT programme only poorly met their expectations. Reasons for this disjuncture included the construction of women as still healthy even when they needed treatment, a focus only on infant health, health system weaknesses, lack of integrated care and timely referral, and defining HIV exclusively as a medical issue, while ignoring the social determinants of health. Women's own health was particularly marginalised within the PMTCT programme, yet good models exist for comprehensive care for women, infants and their families that should be implemented as testing is scaled up.RésuméEn Afrique subsaharienne, de plus en plus de femmes connaissent leur statut sérologique grâce aux programmes de prévention de la transmission mère-enfant du VIH (PTME) dans le contexte des soins prénatals. Cet article examine les décisions des femmes sur le test et leur expérience de la PTME et des soins liés au VIH dans un dispensaire à Lilongwe, Malawi. Il est fondé sur une recherche qualitative ethnographique menée en 2004 et 2005 qui comprenait des entretiens et des discussions de groupe avec 55 femmes séropositives participant à un programme de PTME, et 21 entretiens avec des informateurs clés du programme et du système de santé. Les attentes des femmes quant au dépistage cadraient avec les avantages pour leur santé et celle de leur bébé tels que les infirmières les avaient exposés. Néanmoins, le programme de PTME répondait mal à leurs espérances, notamment du fait que les femmes se voyaient encore en bonne santé alors qu'elles avaient besoin d'un traitement. D'autres raisons étaient l'accent mis uniquement sur la santé du nourrisson, les faiblesses du système de santé, le manque de soins intégrés et de transfert ponctuel des patients, et la définition du VIH exclusivement comme une question médicale, au mépris des déterminants sociaux de la santé. La santé des femmes était particulièrement marginalisée dans le programme de PTME. Pourtant, de bons modèles de soins complets existent pour les femmes, les nourrissons et leur famille. Ils devraient être appliqués alors que le dépistage s'étend.ResumenLas mujeres en Ãfrica subsahariana están conociendo cada vez más su estado de VIH en programas de prevención de la transmisión materno-infantil (PTMI) del VIH, en el contexto de la atención antenatal. Este artículo examina las decisiones de las mujeres respecto a las pruebas de VIH y su experiencia con la PTMI y el tratamiento del VIH en una clínica de Lilongwe, en Malaui. Se basa en una investigación etnográfica cualitativa, realizada en 2004 y 2005, con entrevistas y discusiones en grupos focales con 55 mujeres VIH-positivas, que participaron en un programa de PTMI, y 21 entrevistas con informantes clave del programa y el sistema de salud. Las expectativas de las mujeres en cuanto a las pruebas concordaron con los beneficios para su propia salud y la salud de sus bebés, según informaron las enfermeras. Sin embargo, el programa de PTMI no logró satisfacer bien sus expectativas por las siguientes razones: ver a las mujeres como saludables aun cuando necesitaban tratamiento, centrarse sólo en la salud de los bebés, las debilidades del sistema de salud, la falta de servicios integrados y referencias oportunas, y definir al VIH exclusivamente como un problema médico sin prestar atención a los determinantes sociales de la salud. Aunque la salud de las mujeres fue particularmente marginada en el programa de PTMI, existen buenos modelos de atención integral para las mujeres, sus bebés y sus familias, que deberían implementarse según se vayan ampliando los programas de pruebas del VIH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproductive Health MattersSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207