MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052726063 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2012.6344770

Eigenvalue and robustness analysis of a decentralized voltage control scheme for an islanded multi-DER microgrid

2012· article· en· W2052726063 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsRobust controlVoltageComputer scienceDecentralised systemLTI system theoryControl systemEngineeringControl engineeringLinear systemMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the results of an eigenvalue and robustness analysis of a multi-DER islanded microgrid voltage control scheme. The configuration, parameters, and linear time-invariant (LTI) state-space model of the microgrid are provided. The control strategy, control parameters, and the LTI state-space model of the closed-loop system are also given. An eigenvalue analysis is performed to investigate the dynamic behavior of the study system as microgrid electrical parameters and control gains change. A robustness analysis of the control strategy using the notion of real stability radius is carried out and results are presented. A PSCAD/EMTDC simulation case study is carried out to verify the results of eigenvalue/robustness analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207