Cardiac sympathetic activation in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) due to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction have sympathetic activation specifically directed to the myocardium. Although pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is associated with increased systemic sympathetic activity, its impact on sympathetic drive to ventricular myocardium is unknown. Fifteen patients with PAH (9 women; 54 ± 12 years) were studied: 10 with idiopathic PAH and 5 with a connective tissue disorder. We measured hemodynamics, as well as radiolabeled and endogenous concentrations of arterial and coronary sinus norepinephrine (NE). These measures were repeated after inhaled nitric oxide (NO). Measurement of transcardiac NE concentrations and the cardiac extraction of radiolabeled NE allowed calculation of the corrected transcardiac gradient of NE (CTCG of NE). Comparative data were collected from 15 patients (9 women: 55 ± 12 yr) with normal LV function and 15 patients with CHF (10 women; 53 ± 12 yr). PAH patients had elevated arterial NE concentrations compared with those with normal LV function but were similar to those with CHF. The CTCG of NE was higher in those with PAH than in the normal LV group (3.6 ± 2.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.9 pmol/ml; P < 0.01) but similar to that seen in those with CHF (3.3 ± 1.4; P = NS). Inhaled NO, which reduced pulmonary artery pressure and increased cardiac output, had no effect on cardiac sympathetic activity. Therefore, cardiac sympathetic activation occurs in PAH. The mechanism of this activation remains uncertain but does not involve elevations in left heart filling pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".