MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052777776 · doi:10.5539/jas.v5n4p171

Callogenesis and Organogensis Studies in Some Accessions of Saccharum officnarum L.

2013· article· en· W2052777776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCallusExplant culturePithBiologyHorticultureBotanyOrganogenesisIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the present study was to investigate the response of three sugarcane accessions viz., S-2003-US-824, S-2003-US-230 and SPF-246 for callogenesis and organogenesis. The genotypes showed high value of callus score ranging 2.37 to 2.7. Genotype S-2003-US-824 was highest callus producer with an average of 2.7 callus score per test tube. Genotypes S2003-US-230 and SPF-246 were statistically similar with an average 2.37 and 2.49 respectively. Concentrations of 2, 4 D from 1 5 mg/I were considered to be the good for callus induction with best performance at 3 mg/l. Leaf and pith explants showed good response to callus production but the leaf explant performed better with average callus score of 2.83 per test tube which is statistically different from pith explant (2.21). Thus, it can be inferred that leaf explant is a good source of callus induction than pith explant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it