MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052785478 · doi:10.1353/cjm.2007.0030

Sins of the Flesh: Responding to Sexual Disease in Early Modern Europe ed. by Kevin Siena (review)

2007· article· en· W2052785478 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lauren Coker

Bibliographic record

VenueComitatus · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarly modern EuropeHistoryArt historyArtClassics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

REVIEWS 278 tion in relation to the object. Overall, the entries are detailed, although often repetitive. The catalogue is complemented by a thorough bibliography and a detailed index. Nevertheless, the true gem of this catalogue rests in the wonderful , high-quality color photos of every object displayed in the exhibition, in addition to many other supplemental illustrations, many of which are also in color. Set in Stone is a wonderful resource for anyone interested in medieval sculpture and the trials and tribulations that it has suffered. Furthermore, it advertises new scientific techniques available to medieval scholars, which are sure to assist in future research endeavors. LAUREN GRACE KILROY, Art History, UCLA Sins of the Flesh: Responding to Sexual Disease in Early Modern Europe, ed. Kevin Siena (Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies Publications 2005) 292 pp. The title Sins of the Flesh: Responding to Sexual Disease in Early Modern Europe suggests that the text examines a variety of sexually-transmitted diseases ; however, the focus throughout the book centers primarily on syphilis— particularly the social, medical, and moral implications of the disease in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The editor, Kevin Siena, appealing to a wide readership, compiles a series of essays to present an interdisciplinary perspective on the emergence of syphilis (or, as the text often calls it, the “French pox”) in Europe, thus rendering a modern understanding of an early modern experience of a sexual epidemic. Siena’s introduction provides a comprehensive overview of the “pox” by listing its various nomenclatures, symptoms, and emergence in western European society. The introduction also emphasizes the pervasive link between the venereal disease and moral condemnation throughout European history—an issue that almost all of the included essays explore. In addition to an overview of the history of syphilis in Europe, the introduction further describes the history of scholarship (specifically through the fields of humanities and science) on the disease and briefly summarizes the upcoming essays. Siena divides the ten essays into three sections: “Scientific and Medical Responses ,” “Literary and Metaphoric Responses,” and “Institutional and Policing Responses.” The initial section is by far the least accessible to a typical humanities scholar; yet, the assertions within it still deserve attention as they give a basic interpretation of the disease from a medical standpoint. The first essay in the first section, titled “Medical Responses to the ‘French Disease’ in Europe at the turn of the Sixteenth Century” by Jon Arrizabalaga, chronicles the history of medical theories on syphilis and its contagion. In terms of contagion theories, Arrizabalaga discusses older ideas—ideas once claiming that air, menstruation, and God spread the pox. He also discusses treatment and diagnosis of the illness up to 1500. In terms of the larger text, Siena situates Arrizabalaga ’s essay well; his work provides a contextualized overview of the medical issues surrounding the disease in its initial interactions with society. David Gentilcore’s “Charlatans, the Regulated Marketplace and the Treatment of Venereal Disease in Italy” is the second essay in the medical portion of Siena’s text. Gentilcore’s essay on quackery is loaded with medical jargon. However, the general message of the essay (which suggests that although REVIEWS 279 syphilitics in other parts of Europe had to search for treatment in secrecy, Italian syphilitics of the period had a variety of treatment options) proves worthwhile in that it carves a unique space for Italy in the early modern era of medicine . The third and final essay in this portion of Sins of the Flesh is “Joseph Grünpeck ’s Astrological Explanation of the French Disease” by Darin Hayton. Hayton ’s essay exposes the unfortunate tale of German physician and “political propagandist” Joseph Grünpeck who used astrological means to explain the spread of the pox. In a sad twist of fate, Grünpeck acquired the disease. Overall, while Hayton illustrates an interesting biographical picture of Grünpeck, the author succeeds more in revealing flaws in Grünpeck’s scholarship than in discussing syphilis in its broader social impact. The second section of the Siena’s text is comprised of four literary interpretations of the pox within the early modern era. The first essay in the section is “(Po)x...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComitatusSame topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207