MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052792497 · doi:10.1029/1999gl003731

Quasi‐periodic ionospheric disturbances with a 40‐min period during prolonged northward interplanetary magnetic field

2000· article· en· W2052792497 on OpenAlexaff
Chao‐Song Huang, G. J. Sofko, A. V. Kustov, J. W. MacDougall, D. A. Andre, William Hughes, V. O. Papitashvili

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersAugsburg UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIonosphereGeophysicsElectrojetInterplanetary magnetic fieldMagnetometerEquatorial electrojetPhysicsMagnetosphereSolar windInterplanetary spaceflightGeologyMagnetic fieldAtmospheric sciencesEarth's magnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been observed that quasi‐periodic oscillations in the solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) can result in the generation of auroral electrojet bursts and gravity waves with a similar period. In this paper, we present radar and magnetometer observations of quasi‐periodic ionospheric disturbances during stable, northward IMF. Magnetic deviations of ∼10 nT with a 40‐min periodicity were registered with ground magnetometers between magnetic latitudes 75° and 80° over an extended region along the longitudinal direction in the morning sector. A sequence of gravity waves were observed by HF radars at lower latitudes and appeared to be closely related to the high‐latitude 40‐min current disturbances. There were no obvious source perturbations in the upstream solar wind for the ionospheric disturbances. We suggest that field line resonances could be excited in a closed magnetosphere during prolonged northward IMF and result in the generation of the ionospheric current disturbances and gravity waves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207