MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052809564 · doi:10.1115/sbc2009-206735

Transient and Non-Newtonian Effects on the Wall Shear Stress Distribution of a Stented Artery

2009· article· en· W2052809564 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Mejia, Rosaire Mongrain, Richard L. Leask, Olivier F. Bertrand, Josep Cabau-Rodes

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 2009 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and B · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestenosisCardiologyInternal medicineShear stressMedicineThrombosisBare metalMaterials scienceStentComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the last few decades stents have played a central role in the treatment of artherosclerosis. Although bare-metal stents (BMS) have significantly reduced levels of restenosis rates by 20 or 30% [1], restenosis rates remain high at around 25% [1]. The introduction of drug-eluting stents have reduced restenosis rates even further [2], but are associated with high risk of late thrombosis [3].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME 2009 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and BSame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207