TraDE: Training device selection via multi-objective optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Training planning is a recurring military problem. Since training programs can utilize multiple training devices with varying costs and training capabilities, selecting the types of devices required is a complex trade-off problem. Furthermore, the placement of these devices is critical due to the time and costs involved in travelling to and from the location of a training device. In this paper, we introduce a device bin-packing-and-location-based model, Training Device Estimation (TraDE), to study the computation of heterogeneous device mixes including the location of each device with respect to numerous objectives including various costs and training time. We apply the multi-objective Non-dominating Sorting Genetic Algorithm II to the TraDE model on a population represented by two-dimensional chromosomes. Finally, we also present a new mutation type to handle the nonlinearity inherent in a dual optimization problem which includes scheduling and location optimization. We clearly show that the new mutation operator produces superior results to the standard mutation operator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it