Domain Swapping Localizes the Structural Determinants of Regioselectivity in Membrane-bound Fatty Acid Desaturases of Caenorhabditis elegans
Post-publication record
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement; it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most fatty acid desaturases are members of a large superfamily of integral membrane, O(2)-dependent, iron-containing enzymes that catalyze a variety of oxidative modifications to lipids. Sharing a similar primary structure and membrane topology, these enzymes are broadly categorized according to their positional specificity or regioselectivity, which designates the preferred position for substrate modification. To investigate the structural basis of regioselectivity in membrane-bound desaturases, the Caenorhabditis elegans omega-3 (FAT-1) and "Delta12" (FAT-2) desaturases were used as a model system. With the use of unnatural substrates, the regioselectivity of C. elegans FAT-2 was clearly defined as nu+3, i.e. it "measures" three carbons from an existing double bond. The structural basis for nu+3 and omega-3 regioselectivities was examined through construction and expression of chimeric DNA sequences based on FAT-1 and FAT-2. Each sequence was divided into seven domains, and chimeras were constructed in which specific domains were replaced with sequence from the other desaturase. When tested by expression in yeast using exogenously supplied substrates, chimeric sequences were found in which domain swapping resulted in a change of regioselectivity from nu+3 to omega-3 and vice versa. In this way, the structural determinants of regioselectivity in FAT-1 and FAT-2 have been localized to two interdependent regions: a relatively hydrophobic region between the first two histidine boxes and the carboxyl-terminal region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".