On the resonant generation of large-amplitude internal solitary and solitary-like waves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we discuss numerical simulations of the generation of large-amplitude solitary waves in a continuously stratified fluid by flow over isolated topography. We employ the fully nonlinear theory for internal solitary waves to classify the numerical results for mode-1 waves and compare with two classes of approximate theories, weakly nonlinear theory leading to the Korteweg–deVries and Gardner equations and conjugate flow theory which makes no approximation with respect to nonlinearity, but neglects dispersion entirely. We find that both weakly nonlinear theories have a limited range of applicability. In contrast, the conjugate flow theory predicts the nature of the limiting upstream propagating response (a dissipationless bore), successfully describes the bore's vertical structure, and gives a value of the inflow speed, $c_j$ , above which no upstream propagating response is possible. The numerical experiments demonstrate the existence of a class of large-amplitude response structures that are generated and trapped over the topography when the inflow speed exceeds $c_j$ . While similar in structure to fully nonlinear solitary waves, these trapped disturbances can induce isopycnal displacements more than 100% larger than those induced by the limiting solitary wave while remaining laminar. We develop a theory to describe the vertical structure at the crest of these trapped disturbances and describe its range of validity. Finally, we turn to the generation of mode-2 solitary-like waves. Mode-2 waves cannot be truly solitary owing to the existence of a small mode-1 tail that radiates energy downstream from the wave. We demonstrate that, for stratifications dominated by a single pycnocline, mode-2 wave dissipation is dominated by wave breaking as opposed to mode-1 wave radiation. We propose a phenomenological criterion based on weakly nonlinear theory to test whether mode-2 wave generation is to be expected for a given stratification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".