Research Agenda for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition: Introduction: Report of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition for the Children's Digestive Health and Nutrition Foundation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the Children's Digestive Health and Nutrition Foundation (CDHNF) recognize the importance of addressing current gaps in knowledge and pointing the direction for future research in pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition. In addition, both organizations are keenly aware of the vital need to support excellence in the training of those who will form the next generation of investigators in the field. Therefore, NASPGHAN and CDHNF initiated development of a five-year agenda for research in pediatric digestive and nutritional disorders. At the request of the CDHNF, the Executive Council of NASPGHAN formed the Research Agenda Task Force to identify research needs of the highest priority. The Task Force was charged with the responsibility to define a Research Agenda that clearly enumerates both clinical and basic research requiring support, as well as provides a clear and cogent rationale for these priorities. The Research Agenda would serve as a resource for discussions with funding partners in government, industry and disease-related agencies. The Research Agenda Task Force was organized into subcommittees, each charged with establishing research priorities in specific areas. The subcommittees focused on the following topics: molecular basis of gastrointestinal diseases, developmental physiology and pathophysiology, secretion and diarrhea, acid-peptic diseases, endoscopy, cystic fibrosis and pancreatic diseases, motility disorders and functional gastrointestinal disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, transplantation, nutrition and obesity, chronic inflammatory bowel disease, and allergy and immunology. In some circumstances, the Research Agenda Task Force employed the following materials: Mission Statement of the CDHNF. Pediatric Liver Research Agenda 2000, developed by the Children's Liver Council of The American Liver Foundation. CD Rudolph, HS Winter. NASPGN Guidelines for Training in Pediatric Gastroenterology. NASPGN Executive Council, NASPGN Training and Education Committee. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999;29(suppl 1):S1–26. Challenges in IBD Research: the Clinical Research Agenda for the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America. Challenges in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: the Research Agenda—1998. Other publications that were considered for review included: US Digestive Disease National Commission Summary Report (US government source). Progress Report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Task Force on Training (published in Gastroenterology 1996;110:1266–300). The Research Agenda for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition is presented in this journal supplement. Comprising 12 documents, the report is also available on the NASPGHAN website, http://www.naspghan.org. The Research Agenda has been officially approved by the Executive Council of NASPGHAN and by the Board of Directors of the CDHNF. It is the mission of NASPGHAN, founded in 1972, to be a world leader in advancing the science and clinical practice of pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition in health and disease. The CDHNF was established by NASPGHAN in 1998 to raise funds to promote research and education that will improve the health of children and adolescents with digestive and nutritional disorders. The CDHNF is committed to identify, encourage, support and coordinate the scientific research and professional study of gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, pancreatic and nutritional disorders in children. In addition, the CDHNF aims to strengthen the role of pediatric gastrointestinal and nutritional scientists as leaders in research and education in these medical and health care fields and to evaluate and improve the quality and availability of medical care for children with digestive disorders. The CDHNF also supports the research and educational programs of NASPGHAN. We are hopeful that the Research Agenda for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition will enhance research funding, stimulate advances in knowledge and thereby promote the digestive and nutritional health of children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.039 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.020 | 0.018 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".