MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052909439 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2014.2356132

A Rigorous Approach to Mutual Coupling in General Antenna Systems Through Perturbation Theory

2014· article· en· W2052909439 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputationPerturbation theory (quantum mechanics)Perturbation (astronomy)Galerkin methodTopology (electrical circuits)Coupling (piping)Dipole antennaOperator (biology)Method of moments (probability theory)MathematicsAntenna (radio)Computer scienceMathematical analysisPhysicsAlgorithmTelecommunicationsEngineeringNonlinear systemQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide a theory for describing and computing mutual coupling in arbitrary antenna arrays by applying a perturbation approach to the antenna current Green's function of the problem. In particular, there is no need to invert the full electromagnetic operator of the problem. The procedure proposed in this letter consists of showing that mutual coupling can be estimated by: 1) measurement or computation of the individual device performance; 2) approximation of forward interactions between the elements; and 3) computing the coupling effects algebraically by a perturbation series. The technique is fully general and applies to antennas with arbitrary shape and arbitrary array topologies and size. A proof of concept is supplied using a Galerkin-type numerical implementation of the proposed theory and is compared to the method of moment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it