MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052926203 · doi:10.7202/043840ar

Le projet de code civil pour la République argentine

2005· article· fr· W2052926203 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Julio César Rivera

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de droit · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal processes and jurisprudence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceCivil codeArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Code civil de la République argentine a été sanctionné le 29 septembre 1869 et il est en vigueur depuis 1871. Un projet de nouveau code civil a été présenté en décembre 1998. La Commission de réforme nommée pour le rédiger a tenu compte des enseignements du droit comparé et le Code civil du Québec a mérité une mention spéciale parmi les sources consultées par la Commission de réforme. Bien que le projet ait beaucoup de points communs avec le droit québécois, il comporte aussi des différences importantes comme l’existence d’une « partie générale » dans le projet et l’absence de théorie de l’imprévision dans le droit québécois. Même si le projet n’est pas encore approuvé, il a permis d’entamer un dialogue fécond entre la doctrine québécoise et la doctrine argentine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers de droitSame topicLegal processes and jurisprudenceFrench-language works237,207