MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052966822 · doi:10.1145/381234.381242

A course-assistant based on a curriculum structure and XML resources

2001· article· en· W2052966822 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGCUE Outlook · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceXMLCurriculumProcess (computing)Domain (mathematical analysis)XML frameworkParsingSet (abstract data type)World Wide WebProgramming languagePedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a curriculum that provides a XML representation for a specific domain of knowledge and enables the teacher to closely follow the learning process of each student. Our curriculum is constructed using three kinds of elements: topics, units and links. An area of knowledge can be seen conceptually, or can be organized for a teaching or for a learning purpose. Therefore, the topics of a specific domain can be arranged according to different views using various kinds of link. In our framework, we provide the basic information in a simple collection of XML documents and let the computer generates dynamically a curriculum with its links on the XML resources. Essentially, we use a curriculum to organize an existing set of resources. The current version uses a CGI program written in C++ with a homemade XML parser.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it