MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052978788 · doi:10.1007/s12192-013-0471-6

The co-chaperone DNAJC12 binds to Hsc70 and is upregulated by endoplasmic reticulum stress

2013· article· en· W2052978788 on OpenAlexafffund
Jin Sun Choi, Sonia Djebbar, Andréa Fournier, Claude Labrie

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Stress and Chaperones · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsLNCaPEndoplasmic reticulumChaperone (clinical)Gene isoformSubcellular localizationImmunoprecipitationBiologyCell biologyMolecular biologyHsp70CytoplasmTranscription factorUnfolded protein responseHeat shock proteinGeneBiochemistryCancer cellGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human DNAJC12 is a J domain-containing protein whose regulation, subcellular localization, and function are currently unknown. We show here that the abundance of DNAJC12 in human LNCaP prostate cancer cells is upregulated by the stress-inducing drug A23187 and by the stressregulated transcription factor AIbZIP/CREB3L4. The DNAJC12 gene encodes two isoforms, only one of which (isoform a) is expressed in these cells. Immunofluorescence studies showed that a recombinant DNAJC12 protein is diffusely distributed in the cytoplasm. To identify substrates of DNAJC12, we used an immunoaffinity-mass spectrometry approach in cells that express epitope-tagged DNAJC12. The list of potential DNAJC12-binding proteins that were identified in this screen includes several nucleotide-binding proteins. The most frequently identified partner of DNAJC12 in unstressed cells was Hsc70, a cognate Hsp70 chaperone, whereas in stressed cells, the ER chaperone BiP was frequently associated with DNAJC12. Immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that the endogenous DNAJC12 and Hsc70 proteins interact in LNCaP cells. These results clarify the role of DNAJC12 in the regulation of Hsp70 function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Stress and ChaperonesSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207