Developing a Wearable Multifunctional Composite Component
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on the design and development of a low-cost multifunctional composite component integrated into a shoe hill that generates power in the order of milliwats (mW) through piezoceramic (PZT) stacks and stores this harvested energy in a capacitor integrated into the composite. The use of a thin-film lithium battery integrated into the composite is also explored as a means of permanent power storage. PZT bimorph elements are stacked in a cantilever manner. The space in-between and around the elements is being filled with foam, which provides structural support as well as walking comfort. An insole composite with a PZT layer is also developed that is capable of producing 2.2mW of power to give a total power output of 12.2mW for the in-heel insole combination. The experimental results revealed that the use of PZT bimorph elements (d33=110) instead of polyvinylidene difluoride PVDF sheets (d33=20) increased the power generation potential over five folds, which is further compounded by stacking the PZT elements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".