Effect of plant growth regulators on the tuberisation and physiological age of potato (<i>Solanum tuberosum</i> L.) tubers grown from true potato seed
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of plant growth regulators [6-benzyl amino purine (BA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), gibberellic acid (GA3), chlormequat chloride (CCC), daminozide] and their time of application on tuberisation and physiological age of cv. Chacasina F1 grown from true potato seed (TPS) were studied in four experiments conducted in spring or autumn in Greece. BA, IAA and 2,4-D did not affect plant development, tuberisation or the physiological age of the tubers produced. Daminozide and CCC reduced plant height when applied 30 but not 60 d after transplanting (DAT) in both spring and autumn. Neither substance affected tuberisation or the physiological age of the tubers formed. Application of GA3 30 DAT significantly increased plant height and the number, but not the weight, of tubers formed per plant. Tubers from GA3-treated plants tended to be elongated with a low dry matter content. When GA3 was applied at 60 DAT, plant height was increased, but tuber number, weight and dry matter content were not affected. Late application of GA3 induced a high percentage of sprouted tubers prior to harvest and significantly increased the physiological age of the tubers, as reflected by an increased rate of respiration, sprouting and weight loss after harvest. Although early application of GA3 also increased tuber sprouting prior to harvest, it had no effect on sprouting, respiration and weight loss after harvest. Application of GA3 early in the vegetative cycle may be useful for the production of mini-tubers for propagation, whereas application at a later stage may aid in early planting by accelerating the breaking of tuber dormancy. Key words: Gibberellin, chlormequat chloride, daminozide, dormancy, tuberisation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".