Influence of Solvent on the Energetics of Hole Transfer in DNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have investigated the contribution of molecular environment to the exchange reactions in the DNA molecule taking into account different geometries of the reaction centers in oxidized and reduced states. We have observed the influence of the ionization potential of the donor and the acceptor on the free energy of the hole transfer reaction in the solvated DNA molecule: A decrease of the free energy occurs if IPA > or = IPD and an increase if IPA < or = IPD. The corresponding decrease of the potential barrier by 0.244 eV for hole migration from (G-C) to (A-T) and increase for migration from (G-C) to (G-C)n in solvent have been determined. The prevalence of oxidation of the redox states in the molecule center in comparison to the molecule sides due to the nonuniform charge distribution along the phosphate backbone was found to be stronger for the non-neutralized backbone than for the neutralized case. The influence of the single counterion on the electrostatic interactions within the solute DNA molecule has been found to be smoothly spread over a long distance approximately 7-8 base pairs. Therefore, each counterion contributes to the oxidation potential of the 7-8 nearest nucleosides and any irregularity due to phosphate neutralization would not significantly modify the potential profile for the hole migration through the DNA molecule.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".