Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quelques créations-interprétations de deux cures ouvrent à la problématique d’un certain truchement des jaillissements translinguistiques via un trait qui signe le retour des traumatismes refoulés. De quelle manière les traces incestueuses de l’Idéal du moi, rendent-elles perméables les frontières linguistiques pour telle femme qui demande en rêve une boisson inédite que son inconscient nomme Tubuca ? Ou pour tel homme qui retrouve son souffle à travers l’analyse de son lapsus Papillome ? Les formations de l’inconscient de ces deux analysants dévoilent leur rapport au trait unaire prélevé sur la langue. Ce trait identificatoire est la seule commémoration qui reste de la conjonction entre la langue maternelle et l’inconscient où le signifiant ne demande qu’à venir contaminer le savoir insu avec lequel se débat le sujet… Les vocables de l’Autre qui donnent consistance à l’aire des sensations pulsionnelles de l’infans retrouvent leur sonorité dans le transfert. La coupure subjective, que l’acte analytique introduit dans la jouissance de la lalangue, atteint la lutte à mort du signifiant et dénoue la perspective d’assimiler l’Idéal du moi à un trait de fiction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".