MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053102733 · doi:10.1080/1013929x.2007.9678259

Waiting for the Russians: Coetzee's<i>the master of Petersburg</i>and the logic of late postcolonialism

2007· article· en· W2053102733 on OpenAlexaff
Monica Popescu

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Writing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSouth African History and Culture
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostcolonialism (international relations)GeopoliticsSt petersburgPoliticsCold warTransition (genetics)Position (finance)HistoryField (mathematics)Audience measurementMeditationSociologyAestheticsArtGender studiesPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract JM Coetzee's 1994 novel The Master of Petersburg has puzzled its readership with its geopolitical and temporal distance from the South African scene. I argue that the novel actually portrays some of the more salient features of the transition years, as it reflects on the position of the writer vis‐à‐vis a restructured field of political forces. A meditation on transition time and on the protracted dimension of waiting for a new world to be born, the novel also presents a model of connectivity between Russia and South Africa. It places post‐apartheid culture in a special relationship to postcolonialism and the global configuration born at the end of the Cold War.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent WritingSame topicSouth African History and CultureFrench-language works237,207