MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053104875 · doi:10.1109/dcc.2010.102

Lossless Compression of Maps, Charts, and Graphs via Color Separation

2010· article· en· W2053104875 on OpenAlexaff
Saif alZahir, Arber Borici

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLossless compressionHuffman codingCodebookComputer scienceData compressionAlgorithmRaster graphicsImage compressionEntropy encodingArithmetic codingMathematicsArtificial intelligenceImage processingContext-adaptive binary arithmetic codingImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. In this research, we present a fast and efficient lossless compression scheme for discrete-color digital map images, charts, and graphs stored in the raster image format. The proposed scheme determines the number of different colors in the given image and creates a separate bi-level data layer for each color. Then, the bi-level layers are individually compressed using the proposed algorithm. This scheme comprises two components: (i) a codebook; and (ii) our row-column reduction coding algorithm, RCRC. The codebook is a fixed-to-variable Huffman dictionary that is based on symbol entropy. The second component of our scheme is a new algorithm, the RCRC, designed to deal with those blocks that are not found in the codebook. Our experimental results show that our lossless compression scheme achieved an average compression equal to 0.035 bpp for map images and 0.03 bpp for charts and graphs. These results are better than most reported results in the literature. Moreover, our scheme is simple and fast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207