MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053105347

¿Hasta dónde la corresponsabilidadfiscal en el sistema español de financiaciónautonómica de régimen común? Un ejercicio de comparación con el caso canadiense

2005· article· es· W2053105347 on OpenAlex
Pedro Atienza Montero, Luis Ángel Hierro Recio

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2005
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFinance, Taxation, and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecentralizationAccountabilityWelfare economicsFiscal adjustmentGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceState (computer science)EconomicsFiscal policyMonetary economicsMathematicsMarket economy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMEN Este trabajo centra su interés en la problemática de la corresponsabilidad fiscal del régimen común de financiación autonómica. Se trata de contrastar su reiteradamente denunciada insuficiencia desde una perspectiva comparada con respecto a uno de los Estados federales que presentan mayor nivel de descentralización tributaria: Canadá. Aún así, en primer lugar, se resumen los principales elementos que han constituido el debate sobre esta cuestión en España: aportaciones sobre su relevancia y sobre propuestas de reforma del sistema de financiación autonómica en aras de corregir la situación. Una vez hecho esto, se procede a medir cuantitativamente el grado de corresponsabilidad de cada Gobierno subcentral en ambos países, para, a la postre, realizar un ejercicio de comparación entre los conjuntos de Gobiernos subcentrales que son comparables (aquellos que ostentan similares niveles competenciales de gasto). Asimismo se desagrega la comparación del grado de corresponsabilidad en cuanto a, primero, la participación en el mismo de los tributos directos, indirectos, compartidos o no compartidos, y, segundo, en cuanto a su descomposición en las facultades que integran el poder tributario: regulación, gestión y recaudación. También se realiza un análisis de regresión para comprobar en qué medida el grado de corresponsabilidad está correlacionado con la capacidad económica y fiscal de cada uno de los Gobiernos subcentrales. Este análisis cuantitativo se refiere a los años 2001 y 2002. ABSTRACT This paper has as aim analyse the problem of the fiscal accountability of the regional finances system in Spain. We achieve a comparison with a federal state wich show a high degree of fiscal decentralization: Canada. However, first, we show a summary of the academic debate in Spain on this problem. Subsequently, we measure the degree of fiscal accountability of each regional government in both countries with the aim of to achieve a comparison between the groups de regional governments of each country which have a similar level of spending competences. Also we achieve a regression analysis for to test the degree of correlation between the fiscal capacity and the fiscal accountability in each regional government.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it