MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053114539 · doi:10.1163/221023902x00081

Olga Glagoleva. Working with Russian Archival Documents: A Guide to Modern Handwriting, Documental Forms, Language Patterns, and Other Related Topics. Toronto: Centre for Russian and East European Studies, University of Toronto, 1998. 109 pp. paper.

2002· article· en· W2053114539 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian-American Slavic Studies · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHandwritingBrillLibrary scienceHistoryMedia studiesLinguisticsClassicsSociologyComputer scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Olga Glagoleva. Working with Russian Archival Documents: A Guide to Modern Handwriting, Documental Forms, Language Patterns, and Other Related Topics. Toronto: Centre for Russian and East European Studies, University of Toronto, 1998. 109 pp. paper." published on 01 Jan 2002 by Brill | Schöningh.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it