MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053147723 · doi:10.1002/nem.625

A simple mechanism for stabilizing network queues in TCP/IP networks

2006· article· en· W2053147723 on OpenAlexaff
James Aweya, Michel Ouellette, Delfin Y. Montuno

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Network Management · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive queue managementComputer scienceQueuePadé approximantSimple (philosophy)Nonlinear systemStability (learning theory)Queueing theoryController (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)Network congestionComputer networkControl (management)Applied mathematicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper we determine the stability bounds for the DRED active queue management (AQM) algorithm using a previously developed nonlinear dynamic model of TCP. We develop a second‐order linear model with time delay by linearizing the nonlinear model. Using the Pade approximation of time‐delayed systeme−R0s, whereR0is the delay in the system, we then determine the range of stabilizing gains of DRED when controlling the second‐order system with time delayR0. We also present examples showing the stability bounds of the DRED controller gain for networks with different parameters such as link capacity, load level, and round‐trip time. In addition, we describe an efficient implementation of the DRED AQM algorithm. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Network ManagementSame topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207