MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053164728 · doi:10.1063/1.1482798

Role of substrate in the pseudomorphic stabilization of rocksalt-type AlN phase in AlN/TiN superlattices

2002· article· en· W2053164728 on OpenAlexaff
Vladimir Pankov, Mykhaylo Evstigneev, R.H. Prince

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal and Thin Film Mechanics
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceTinEpitaxyWurtzite crystal structureSuperlatticeCrystallizationSubstrate (aquarium)CrystallinityAmorphous solidThin filmPhase (matter)Pulsed laser depositionOptoelectronicsComposite materialCrystallographyChemical engineeringMetallurgyNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)ZincChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nonequilibrium B1 (rocksalt-type) AlN phase was successfully stabilized in stress-free AlN/TiN superlattices prepared by room-temperature pulsed laser deposition on thin film amorphous carbon substrates. The coatings displayed the same properties as reported for multilayers grown on thick crystalline substrates; namely, the existence of a critical thickness of AlN (about 1 nm for the present study) below which AlN crystallizes in the B1–AlN phase. Exceeding this value lead to AlN crystallization in its equilibrium hexagonal wurtzite-type structure, accompanied by considerable degradation of coating crystallinity due to the loss of coherent epitaxial growth of alternating TiN and AlN layers in the coating. It is concluded that neither an orientational effect of the substrate nor its stress-sustaining ability is required to provide a pseudomorphic stabilization of the nonequilibrium B1–AlN phase in AlN/TiN multilayered coatings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicMetal and Thin Film MechanicsFrench-language works237,207