MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053193457 · doi:10.1587/transfun.e93.a.914

Cramer-Rao Bound on Passive Source Localization for General Gaussian Noise

2010· article· en· W2053193457 on OpenAlexaff
Sha Li, Brian L. F. Daku

Bibliographic record

VenueIEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGaussian noiseNoise (video)GaussianRepresentation (politics)SIGNAL (programming language)Noise measurementCramér–Rao boundMathematicsComputer scienceUpper and lower boundsAlgorithmSpeech recognitionEstimation theoryMathematical analysisPhysicsNoise reductionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the development of Cramér-Rao Bound (CRB) expressions for passive source location estimation in various Gaussian noise environments. The scenarios considered involve an unknown deterministic source signal with a short time duration, and additive general Gaussian noise. The mathematical derivation procedure presented is applicable to non-stationary Gaussian noise problems. Specifically, explicit closed-form CRB expressions are presented using the spectrum representation of the signal and noise for stationary Gaussian noise cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer SciencesSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207