Diffusion LMS algorithms for sensor networks over non-ideal inter-sensor wireless channels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose diffusion-based least mean square (LMS) algorithms that are robust against fading phenomena in wireless channels. The proposed algorithms, developed by combining diffusion LMS and classical estimation approaches, are able to estimate and update the underlying system parameters at each node by exploiting the sensor measurements and the fused data obtained from the neighboring nodes. The fusion of the information at each node takes place based on a convex combination strategy whose coefficients are determined according to the channel state information, the noise statistics and the output error of the local adaptive filter. In this work, we assume the broadcast data from the sensors experience Rayleigh fading and are further contaminated by the additive noise. Numerical results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed algorithms and show their satisfactory performance compared with the costly centralized adaptive techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it