MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053213852 · doi:10.1115/imece2004-60090

Vibration Analysis of Composite Wings Undergoing Material and Geometrical Couplings: A Dynamic Finite Element Formulation

2004· article· en· W2053213852 on OpenAlex
Seyed M. Hashemi, Stephen R. Borneman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAerospace · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFinite element methodVibrationTorsion (gastropod)Virtual workEuler's formulaBeam (structure)Structural engineeringBernoulli's principleTimoshenko beam theoryCoupling (piping)TrigonometryMathematical analysisMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringAcousticsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The differential equations governing Geometric-Materially coupled torsion-flexural vibrations of laminated composite wings are first reviewed. Based on the finite element methodology (FEM), Euler-Bernoulli and St-Venant beam theories, the Dynamic Trigonometric Shape Functions (DTSFs) for the beam’s uncoupled displacements are thereafter derived. Exploiting the Principle of Virtual Work (PVW) and interpolating the variables based on the DTSF, the Dynamic Finite Element (DFE) formulations for uniform beams’ coupled vibrations are first developed. The variable geometrical and mechanical parameters are then incorporated in the formulation. The applicability of the DFE method is then demonstrated by two illustrative examples where a Wittrick-Williams root counting technique is used to find the systems’ natural frequencies. The proposed DFE approach can also be advantageously extended to incorporate more complexities, further coupling as well as other geometrical and mechanical parameters in the formulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it