Multi‐model statistical process monitoring and diagnosis of a sequencing batch reactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biological processes exhibit different behavior depending on the influent loads, temperature, microorganism activity, and so on. It has been shown that a combination of several models can provide a suitable approach to model such processes. In the present study, we developed a multiple statistical model approach for the monitoring of biological batch processes. The proposed method consists of four main components: (1) multiway principal component analysis (MPCA) to reduce the dimensionality of data and to remove collinearity; (2) multiple models with a posterior probability for modeling different operating regions; (3) local batch monitoring by the T(2)- and Q-statistics of the specific local model; and (4) a new discrimination measure (DM) to identify when the system has shifted to a new operating condition. Under this approach, local monitoring by multiple models divides the entire historical data set into separate regions, which are then modeled separately. Then, these local regions can be supervised separately, leading to more effective batch monitoring. The proposed method is applied to a pilot-scale 80-L sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for biological wastewater treatment. This SBR is characterized by nonstationary, batchwise, and multiple operation modes. The results obtained for the pilot-scale SBR indicate that the proposed method has the ability to model multiple operating conditions, to identify various operating regions, and also to determine whether the biosystem has shifted to a new operating condition. Our findings show that the local monitoring approach can give more reliable and higher resolution monitoring results than the global model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".