MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053234592 · doi:10.1021/jp9010873

Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of Cerium Monoxide

2009· article· en· W2053234592 on OpenAlexaff
C. Linton, Jinhai Chen, Timothy C. Steimle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDipoleCeriumChemistryGround stateBond dipole momentMonoxideLanthanideMoment (physics)Stark effectTransition dipole momentElectric dipole momentAtomic physicsElectric dipole transitionAb initio quantum chemistry methodsAb initioSpectral lineAtom (system on chip)Magnetic dipoleInorganic chemistryIonPhysicsMoleculeQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stark spectra of the [16.5]2-X(1)2 and [16.5]2-X(2)3 transitions of cerium monoxide (CeO) have been obtained at a resolution of approximately 50 MHz. Analysis of the Stark spectra yielded permanent electric dipole moments, mu(el), of 3.119(8), 3.115(7), and 2.119(8) D for the X(1)2, X(2)3, and [16.5]2 states, respectively. The ground X(1)2 state dipole moment is shown to follow the trend shown by other lanthanide oxides. While most ab initio calculations tend to overestimate the ground state dipole moment, the value calculated by using pseudopotentials in which the 4f orbital participates in the chemical bonding (Dolg,M.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H. THEOCHEM 1991, 231, 243] is in very good agreement with our experimental value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207