MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053239407 · doi:10.1002/cjce.20334

Investigation of hydrodynamics of binary fluidized beds via radioactive particle tracking and dual‐source densitometry

2010· article· en· W2053239407 on OpenAlex
Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay, Shantanu Roy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Human Resource DevelopmentMinistry of Education, IndiaDepartment of Atomic Energy, Government of IndiaDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsPhysicsFluidizationParticle (ecology)Mixing (physics)DensitometryFluidized bedMineralogyThermodynamicsChemistryOpticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The mixing and hydrodynamic behaviour of binary fluidized beds of particles of same size and differing density has been investigated experimentally by using radiation based non‐invasive techniques, viz . radioactive particle tracking (RPT) and dual‐source densitometry. The effect of air inlet velocity and bed composition has been investigated. RPT experiments are performed individually for both the solids by tracking one particle at a time. Many interesting findings are discussed, for example, such as the heavier (jetsam) phase is seen to be fluidized by action of the lighter (flotsam) phase even below its minimum fluidization velocity. Further, it has been found that while with increase in air inlet velocity, the extent of mixing of solid phases increases; even at very high air velocities the jetsam phase is not completely mixed. The important role played by the particle–particle collisions in the fluidization of binary mixtures is quantitatively highlighted. Le mélange et le comportement hydrodynamique des lits fluidisés binaires de particules de même taille et de différentes densités ont été étudiés expérimentalement en utilisant une technique non invasive à base de rayonnements par le suivi des particules radioactives et la densitométrie à double foyer. L'effet de la vitesse d'admission d'air et de la composition du lit a été étudié. Des expériences de suivi des particules radioactives sont exécutées individuellement pour chacun des deux solides par le suivi d'une particule à la fois. Plusieurs résultats intéressants sont discutés, comme par exemple, il est observé que la phase plus lourde (jetsam) est fluidisée par l'action de la phase plus légère (flotsam), même en dessous de sa vitesse minimum de fluidisation. De plus, il a été constaté que, tandis qu'avec l'accroissement de la vitesse d'admission d'air, l'ampleur du mélange des phases solides augmente, la phase jetsam n'est pas complètement mélangée même à des vitesses d'air très élevées. Le rôle important joué par les collisions particule‐particule dans la fluidisation des mélanges binaires est quantitativement mis en évidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it