Host microtubules in the Hartig net region of ectomycorrhizas, ectendomycorrhizas, and monotropoid mycorrhizas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Various categories of mycorrhizas are recognized primarily by the structural changes that occur between fungi and roots. In all mycorrhiza categories, cytological modifications of root cells accompany the establishment of the functional symbiosis, and among these are alterations in the organization of the cytoskeleton. Using immuno labelling combined with confocal scanning laser microscopy, this study documents changes in microtubules (MTs) in root cells of ectendomycorrhizas and monotropoid mycorrhizas; in addition, ectomycorrhizas were reinvestigated to determine the effect of fungal colonization on host root cells. In Pinus banksiana L. Laccaria bicolor (Maire) Orton ectomycorrhizas, MTs were present in epidermal and cortical cells adjacent to the Hartig net. The remaining cortical MTs had a different organization when compared with those of cortical cells of control roots. MTs were present in Hartig net hyphae. In ectendomycorrhizas formed when roots of P. banksiana were colonized by the ascomycete, Wilcoxina mikolae var. mikolae Yang & Korf, MTs were present adjacent to intracellular hyphae and host nuclei, but few cortical MTs were present. MTs were present within Hartig net and intracellular hyphae. In field-collected roots of Monotropa uniflora L., MTs were associated with fungal pegs, intracellular extensions of inner mantle hyphae within epidermal cells. The close association between MTs and fungal pegs may be related to the formation of the highly branched host-derived wall that envelops each fungal peg. The development of exchange interfaces in the three systems studied involve changes in the organization of microtubules.Key words: cytoskeleton, microtubules, Hartig net, mycorrhizas, immunolocalization, confocal microscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".