MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053254893 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450790608

Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propene, 2: Simulation of a commercial inert membrane reactor immersed in a fluidized bed

2001· article· en· W2053254893 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysis and Oxidation Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropeneDehydrogenationPropaneMembrane reactorFluidized bedChemistryChemical engineeringMembraneCatalysisOxygenPartial oxidationInertHydrocarbonMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A novel reactor concept is proposed for partial oxidation reactions that combines membrane and fluid bed reactor technology in a single vessel. Air fluidizes the shell side in which both membrane tubes — charged with catalyst — and cooling coils are immersed. Oxygen transport through the membrane wall is controlled by pressure drop. Model simulations, based on the kinetics for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propene, show improved performance compared to conventional fixed bed technology. The controlled oxygen addition along the axis improves propene selectivity and broadens the operating range with respect to hydrocarbon and oxygen feed rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it