MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053256128 · doi:10.1159/000053693

SDF-1 Induces IL-8 Production and Transendothelial Migration of Human Cord Blood-Derived Mast Cells

2001· article· en· W2053256128 on OpenAlexaff
Tong‐Jun Lin, Thomas B. Issekutz, Jean S. Marshall

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Archives of Allergy and Immunology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemokine receptors and signaling
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemokineCord bloodDegranulationCytokineAngiogenesisImmunologyMast cellStromal cellCXC chemokine receptorsBiologyChemokine receptorInflammationCell biologyReceptorCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mast cell numbers and expression of chemokines are known to increase in the context of angiogenesis and inflammation, but the mechanisms by which this occurs are not understood. Stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) is an important chemokine in angiogenesis and cell migration. The effects of SDF-1 on human mast cells were examined. METHODS: Expression of the SDF-1 receptor CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) on mast cells was examined by RT-PCR and flow cytometry. The ability of labeled cord blood-derived mast cells to migrate across HUVEC monolayers in response to SDF-1 was determined. The cytokine and chemokine responses of cord blood-derived mast cells to SDF-1 treatment over 24 h were examined by ELISA. RESULTS: Cord blood-derived human mast cells expressed the CXCR4 receptor for SDF-1 and migrated across HUVEC monolayers in response to this chemokine. Treatment of cord blood-derived mast cells with SDF-1 did not induce degranulation or the production of several cytokines but did induce a highly selective IL-8 response. CONCLUSION: Human mast cells can both migrate across vascular endothelium and produce the pro-angiogenic chemokine IL-8 in response to SDF-1. These responses may be important in angiogenic processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Archives of Allergy and ImmunologySame topicChemokine receptors and signalingFrench-language works237,207