L’espace public entre mythe, imaginaire et culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'aménagement fait souvent appel à l'idée d'espace public, dont la portée sociale et politique demeure toutefois très discutée. Or une approche géographique peut aider à clarifier les aspects qui conditionnent son utilisation. On note d'abord que l'idée d'espace public s'inscrit sur un fond mythique porté par les idées de modernité, de justice, de démocratie, de rationalité et de sujet. Mais l'espace public ne fonctionne pas sur le mode du mythe, car il repose sur des normes et des règles qui mobilisent la rationalité du sujet. Il n'est pas pour autant un espace sans qualifications matérielles, sociales ni culturelles. Au contraire, il constitue un lieu, à la fois matériel et immatériel, qui fait aussi appel à l'imaginaire et à l'activité narrative du sujet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".