MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053258791 · doi:10.7202/023001ar

L’espace public entre mythe, imaginaire et culture

2005· article· fr· W2053258791 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vincent Berdoulay, Iná Elias de Castro, Paulo César da Costa Gomes

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de géographie du Québec · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPublic spaceArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'aménagement fait souvent appel à l'idée d'espace public, dont la portée sociale et politique demeure toutefois très discutée. Or une approche géographique peut aider à clarifier les aspects qui conditionnent son utilisation. On note d'abord que l'idée d'espace public s'inscrit sur un fond mythique porté par les idées de modernité, de justice, de démocratie, de rationalité et de sujet. Mais l'espace public ne fonctionne pas sur le mode du mythe, car il repose sur des normes et des règles qui mobilisent la rationalité du sujet. Il n'est pas pour autant un espace sans qualifications matérielles, sociales ni culturelles. Au contraire, il constitue un lieu, à la fois matériel et immatériel, qui fait aussi appel à l'imaginaire et à l'activité narrative du sujet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.019
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de géographie du QuébecSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207