MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053281950 · doi:10.3406/outre.2003.4045

De l'origine du préjugé de couleur en Haïti

2003· article· fr· W2053281950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOutre-mers · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'histoire de la république d'Haïti est marquée par un fort antagonisme entre ceux que l'on appelle les « mulâtres », assimilés aux anciens libres de couleur, et les « noirs », perçus comme les descendants des anciens esclaves. Les récents travaux sur les libres de couleur permettent de mieux connaître les premiers. Ces hommes sont composés de métis, mais aussi d'un nombre important de « nègres libres », des libres de naissance ou des affranchis, souvent propriétaires d'esclaves et de biens immeubles en ville ou à la campagne. Si la minorité des grands planteurs du Sud, du Nord et de l'Ouest souhaite l'assimilation et le blanchiment légal, la majorité des petits et moyens propriétaires, comme nombre d'affranchis, assume leur identité complexe. Ils entretiennent ainsi des relations plus proches avec les esclaves. En outre, en dépit du préjugé de couleur, ils créent, dans les zones où les nègres libres sont les plus riches, des communautés véritables, ouvertes à tous, indépendamment de la couleur et du statut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it