MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053294549 · doi:10.1159/000117871

Paranatal Complications Are Not Associated with Affective Disorders in the Offspring of Bipolar Manic-Depressives

2008· article· en· W2053294549 on OpenAlexaff
Brent Waters, Irene Marcenko-Bouer, Donna Fisher Smiley

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropsychobiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffspringBipolar disorderPsychiatryPopulationSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychologyPrevalence of mental disordersPregnancyClinical psychologyMedicineCognitionMental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pregnancy and birth records of 55 of 58 adult offspring of 17 bipolar manic-depressives were obtained. All but 3 of the subjects had been previously interviewed to ascertain the prevalence of psychiatric disorders. Paranatal complications and affective disorders appeared to be distributed independent of each other within this population. The presence of paranatal complications did not enhance the risk of affective disorders in this population, nor did they bring their onset forward in time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropsychobiologySame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207