Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There have been several recent insights in our understanding of how best to provide optimal perioperative anesthesia and analgesia for ambulatory shoulder surgery. This review attempts to distill the advances reported in the past 12-18 months and put them in perspective. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have explored the optimal dosing regimens and techniques for single-shot and continuous nerve blocks with regard to block effectiveness and complications. Further rigorously conducted studies into postoperative neurological and respiratory complications are correlated with study findings of brachial plexus anatomy. Evidence is presented supporting supraclavicular brachial plexus block as an equivalent alternative to interscalene block for ambulatory shoulder surgery. SUMMARY: Following recent findings it is likely that the use of supraclavicular block will become more popular for shoulder surgery. However, further large-scale trials will be needed to definitively prove its advantages over the traditional interscalene block. On the contrary, the precision of ultrasound guidance and the ongoing optimization of postoperative continuous anesthetic infusion regimens continue to improve the performance characteristics of interscalene block.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".